SEO本頁主標題

© Craneglobal Environmental Technology Limited
web design by GRNET
*

Our Products

鑫鶴-CGD-8
鑫鶴-CGD-2 (3)
鑫鶴-CGD-5 (2)
鑫鶴-CGD-6
鑫鶴-CGD-9
鑫鶴-CGD-8
鑫鶴-CGD-2 (3)
鑫鶴-CGD-5 (2)
鑫鶴-CGD-6
鑫鶴-CGD-9

CGD

Equipment Name:
  • Plasma Ozone Purification Equipment
Pollutants removal efficiency:
  • VOCs: 70~80%
  • Odor: 70~80%
  • Particles: 80~85%
  • Dust and oil: 80~85%
  • Fumes: 30~40%
Recommended for:
  • Big airflow (300~1000Nm3/min)
  • Operation time longer than 12 hours
  • High concentration of odor and VOCs

Feature

1. Equipment Description


  • 3 steps of removing pollutants:
ozone(oxidation) → scrubber (wet scrubbing) → activated carbon filter (odor adsorption)
  • PSA automatic oxygen genrator produces high concentration of ozone
  • Patented separation filter (packing) processes oxidation to decompose pollutants
  • Patented separation filters (packing layer) hardly get clogged 
  • Scrubbing solution can be re-used with water circulation system
  • Ozone can increase the lifetime of activated carbon filters
2. Working Principle of Plasma Ozone
The principle of generating Ozone is to let the oxygen molecules go through the high voltage tube, make high energy electrical pulse bumped into the oxygen molecules to dissociate the bond and became to the oxygen atom. Oxygen atoms combine with the other oxygen molecules to become the ozone molecules. The higher concentration of ozone was generated by the pure oxygen. The plasma PSA system  produced high concentration ozone to raise the efficiency and reduce costs. The ozone combines with pollutants and stay in the reaction tank for a while. After ozone and pollutants oxidizing, it can    decompose CO2, water and nontoxic salts.
Ozone can remove the organic substances in the air and water effectively but doesn’t have the reaction with them. It also has the advantages of no pollution, no remain in the environment. 
3. Application Fields

Application Fields
1 Chemical Industry
2 Electro-Optical Industry
3 Printing Industry
4 Dye Industry
5 Food Industry
6 Textile Industry
7 Paper Industry
8 Plastic Injection Molding Industry
9 Agrochemical Industry
10 Electronic Components Manufacturing
11 Feeding Processing Industry
12 Rubber Industry
13 Iron and Steel Industry
14 Screw Industry
15 Asphalt Concrete Industry
16 Pharmaceutical Industry
17 Metal Casting Industry
18 Semi-Conductor Manufacturing
19 Manufacturing
20 Bio-Technology
21 Surface Treatment
22 Metal Manufacturing
23 Wiring and Cable Manufacturing
24 Waste Water Treatment
25 Bare Printed Circuit Boards Manufacturing
26 Refuse Incineration Plant

Advantages

1. Comparison of Wet Scrubbers
High Efficiency
Wet Scrubber System
Conventional Wet Scrubber
*
*
*
1. Packing's specific surface area
*

100m2/m3
(better to be between 90~110m2/m3)
*

Over 120m2/m3
2. Height of the packing
15~25cm 110~150cm
3. Maintenance
  • Not easy to be clogged
  • DIY maintenance / year
  • Maintenancefee: USD70~USD100
  • Easy to be clogged
  • Cleaning or replace once a year
  • Maintenancefee: USD1,000 ~ USD6,400
*
4. Mist Eliminator
  • Multi-layer stainless steel mist eliminator
  • No clogging
  • No replacement
  • PP grating or PP filler
  • Easy to be clogged
  • Replacement needed
5. Mist Elimination Efficiency
98~99% 60~70%
6. Pressure Loss
20mmAq 60mmAq
7. Installation Space
Smaller Bigger

2. Comparison of Ozone Generators
Plasma Catalyst Ozone   Generator Quarts Tube 
Ozone Generator
1. Ozone Concentration
50,000 ppm 7,500 ppm
2. Treatment Efficiency (the same quantity of ozone)
80~90% 25~30%
3. Annual Maintenance
Dust-proof and
Automatic drain
(Less maintenance)
Easy to be influenced by dust and vapor, 
Breakdown problems
(More maintenance)
4. Oxygen Supply
PSA auto supply system
External oxygen cylinder
5. Power Consumption
1/3 time 1 time
6. Maintenance Expenses ( every 3,600 hours or every year)
1/2 time 1 time

3. Comparison of VOCs and Odor Removal Equipments
Items Plasma Ozone Treatment
1. Cost Middle
2. Annual Operation Fee The Lowest
3. Follow-up Requirement of Equipment No
4. Environmental Protection Standard Qualified
5. Annual Average Cost Low
6. Organic Exhaust Gas Removal Efficiency 50~80%
7. Maintenance Easy

Items Incineration
1. Cost The most highest
2. Annual Operation Fee The most highest
3. Follow-up Requirement of Equipment Replace consumables
4. Environmental Protection Standard Qualified
5. Annual Average Cost High
6. Organic Exhaust Gas Removal Efficiency >90%
7. Maintenance Middle

Items Active Carbon Adsorption
1. Cost Low
2. Annual Operation Fee High
3. Follow-up Requirement of Equipment Replace active carbon
4. Environmental Protection Standard Qualified
5. Annual Average Cost The most highest
6. Organic Exhaust Gas Removal Efficiency >80%
7. Maintenance Easy

Items Bio-Filters
1. Cost High
2. Annual Operation Fee Low
3. Follow-up Requirement of Equipment Biological bacteria culture
4. Environmental Protection Standard Qualified
5. Annual Average Cost Middle
6. Organic Exhaust Gas Removal Efficiency >40%
7. Maintenance Easy

4. Comparison of Plasma Ozone Purification and Other Techniques

Table 1
Concentration
+Incineration
(1)No fuel consuming.
(2)No influence on high boiling point substance.
(3) No disposal problem.
Plasma Ozone
purification
(1)High cost of fuel consuming.
(2)High boiling point substances of the exhaust influence on adsorption lifetime.
(3)Disposal problem.

Table 2
Active Carbon Fluidized Bed System + Condenser System (1)High temperature and Nitrogen desorption needed. High cost.
(2) High boiling point substances of the exhaust influence on adsorption lifetime.
(3) Disposal problem.
Plasma Ozone
purification
(1)Operation in low temperature. Low risk.
(2)No influence to high boiling point substance.
(3) No disposal problem.

Table 3
Bio-Filters Require large installation area.
Plasma Ozonepurification Resuire small installation area.

Table 4
Active Carbon Adsorption (1)Massive consumables need to be replaced constantly. High cost.
(2) Disposal problem.
Plasma Ozone
purification
(1) No massive consumables need to be replaced constantly.
(2) No disposal problem.

Table 5
Wet Scrubber Waste water problem.
Plasma Ozone
purification
Less waste water.

Table 6
Conventional Scrubber (1) Lower efficiency by using sodium hypochlorite.
(2)Concern of generating Chlorinated Organic Compounds.
Plasma Ozone
purification
(1)Higher efficiency by using O3.
(2)No concern of generating Chlorinated Organic Compounds. 

Specification

Capacity (m3/min) 1~300
Type CGD-300
Installation size(M) L11 x W3
Material SUS304
PP
FRP
SS400
Total Weight 
(equipment only)
3,130kg
Power Consumption
(KW)
7.5KW
Capacity (m3/min) 301~400
Type CGD-400
Installation size (M) L11 x W3
Material SUS304
PP
FRP
SS400
Total Weight 
(equipment only)
3,500kg
Power Consumption
(KW)
7.5KW
Capacity (m3/min) 401~500
Type CGD-500
Installation size(M) L13 x W3
Material SUS304
PP
FRP
SS400
Total Weight 
(equipment only)
4,650kg
Power Consumption
(KW)
9.5KW
Capacity (m3/min) 501~600
Type CGD-600
Installation size(M) L13 x W3
Material SUS304
PP
FRP
SS400
Total Weight 
(equipment only)
5,430kg
Power Consumption
(KW)
10.2KW
Capacity (m3/min) 601~700
Type CGD-700
Installation size(M) L13 x W3
Material SUS304
PP
FRP
SS400
Total Weight 
(equipment only)
5,980kg
Power Consumption
(KW)
12KW
Capacity (m3/min) 701~850
Type CGD-850
Installation size(M) L13 x W3
Material SUS304
PP
FRP
SS400
Total Weight 
(equipment only)
6,970kg
Power Consumption
(KW)
15.2KW
Capacity (m3/min) 851~1,000
Type CGD-1000
Installation size(M) L13 x W3
Material SUS304
PP
FRP
SS400
Total Weight 
(equipment only)
11,235kg
Power Consumption
(KW)
18.3KW

Files

  • CGD-Plasma Ozone Purification Equipment Download

Video

CGD-Plasma Ozone Purification Equipment

Customer Performance